Lafarge Ex-CEO and staff convicted of financing terror in Syria

A French court has found Lafarge and several of its former executives guilty of financing terrorist groups, in a landmark ruling that revisits one of the most controversial corporate scandals tied to the Syrian war.

At the centre of the case is Bruno Lafont, who was sentenced to six years in prison after the court determined that the company paid millions of dollars to armed groups, including the Islamic State, between 2013 and 2014.

Eight other staff members were also convicted for their roles in facilitating the payments, which prosecutors said were made to keep Lafarge’s cement plant operational in northern Syria during the height of the conflict.

Payments for access and survival

According to the court, Lafarge transferred at least $6.5 million to insurgent groups, effectively entering what the judge described as a “commercial relationship” with террорист organisations.

The funds were reportedly used to secure safe passage for employees and ensure continued access to the plant, even as the region descended into violence.

In its defence, the company argued that the decision was driven by concern for local staff, many of whom depended on the plant for their livelihoods. Executives claimed shutting down operations abruptly could have exposed workers to greater risks.

But the court rejected that justification, ruling that the payments were primarily motivated by economic interests, not humanitarian concerns.

“It is clear that the purpose of the funding was to keep the plant running,” the presiding judge stated.

A long-running legal battle with global implications

The ruling adds to Lafarge’s mounting legal troubles. In 2022, the company reached a separate settlement in the United States, agreeing to pay $777 million after pleading guilty to similar charges linked to payments made to terrorist groups.

This latest conviction reinforces how multinational corporations operating in conflict zones can become entangled in complex ethical and legal dilemmas, especially when business continuity collides with security realities.

For Lafarge, what began as an operational decision in a war zone has evolved into a defining corporate scandal, raising enduring questions about accountability, corporate governance, and the limits of doing business in high-risk environments.

Also read: Nigerian airstrikes repeatedly miss targets in anti-insurgency operations, kills 200