
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April 21, 2026, to hear an application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission seeking permanent forfeiture of 57 properties linked to former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami.
The properties, located across Abuja, Kebbi, Kano, and Kaduna states, were earlier placed under interim forfeiture following a court order in January 2026.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik set the date to consider the EFCC’s request alongside objections filed by Malami and other interested parties.
The EFCC had previously secured an interim forfeiture order from the court after arguing that the properties were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.
The court directed the anti-graft agency to publicly announce the order and allow affected parties to respond and show why the assets should not be permanently taken over by the federal government.
Following the order, the EFCC filed a motion requesting final forfeiture, which would transfer ownership of the properties permanently to the government if approved.
The agency also told the court it had received multiple applications from individuals and entities challenging the forfeiture.

Malami has opposed the EFCC’s application, asking the court to cancel the interim forfeiture order. He argued that the order was obtained through misrepresentation and concealment of key facts.
He also said the forfeiture process violates his constitutional rights, including his right to own property and his right to fair legal treatment.
Malami Corruption Case Stalls as Trial Judge Steps Aside
His legal team urged the court to restart the process and dismiss the EFCC’s claims.
However, the EFCC disagreed, maintaining that the forfeiture process followed due legal procedures and remains valid.
In her ruling, Justice Abdulmalik said all applications related to the case, including the EFCC’s forfeiture request and objections from Malami and others, will be heard together on April 21.
The judge also directed all parties to file their legal documents before the hearing date as the court prepares to decide the fate of the disputed properties.